Regulation…Who Needs It?

Regulation of games of chance is, by its nature, a social policy issue aimed at protecting consumers. Despite this shared principle being the cause, the intensity of regulation of gambling sectors can vary and a constructive debate on the issue must inevitably entail a comprehensive understanding of the multi-faceted nature of regulation.

This article is based on Lea Meyer’s presentation at EL Seminar in Brussels, November 2017.

Regulation constitutes one of the main modes of public governance. It is the instrument which implements public policies and structures the delivery of public services. Regulation’s aim is to alter the behaviour of actors in a given sector.

Rationale for regulation

Regulation of games of chance falls under the category of social regulation. This is essentially the will of a democratically elected executive to bring a subject into the public policy sphere because of a political, ethical or social imperative. It usually addresses a public interest such as health, the environment or security, and the economic impact is usually not the main concern. In this context, prevention of the potentially harmful effects of gambling, namely pathological gambling i.e. addiction, is the principal motivation.

Pathological gambling is characterised by enduring and repeated maladjusted gambling behaviour that diminishes personal, familial or professional aims, invariably leading to problems in those spheres.

Gambling addiction is a problem in its own right for the persons affected by it, but arguably, it also represents a problem in terms of the limitations it puts on the operations of organisers and the state.

In a sense it threatens the business model by introducing limitations and concerns at the social and political levels. It is a situation that few organisations can afford to ignore.

Another rationale for gambling regulation is the protection of minors. In most jurisdictions, gambling is age restricted and operators are required to ensure that minors are prevented from participating.

A second rationale for regulation is the prevention of associated criminality. The main focus here is money laundering, fraud and corruption. However illegal gambling, both land-based (in back-stores) and cross-border (via internet), also fall in to this category.

Equally, regulation allows states to benefit from the large scale economic activity, by receiving a share of, or in some cases all, the profits generated by operators.

Thus, we see that the reasons for regulation are very similar, however their form can vary widely. A useful means of differentiating the form of regulation is by analysing its intensity.

Multifaceted approach to regulation

Usually regulation is simply reduced to its jurisdictional and fiscal components, however, it is far more pervasive, playing on two dimensions – intensity and scope.

Regulatory intensity can be evaluated by means of ten different parameters, which can be grouped into two main components: regulatory scope and regulatory stringency. The next table summarises the different parameters making up a regulation.[1]

Scope defines to what extent the regulation affects a specific sector or organisation. It includes factors such as the market structure i.e. the level of competition allowed in the sector, regulatory reach – whether there are further legal obligations beyond simply obtaining a license, the imposition of a specific public use of the net profits, the imposition of the type of ownership by the regulation or the presence of a public nature in the organisation above and beyond the issue of ownership (“Publicness”). The second dimension is regulatory stringency. Stringency is the degree to which the organisation’s activities are constrained by regulation. It occurs on two levels – the regulator and the organisational level.

The level of the regulator focuses on whether there is actually a regulator or not, and if so, what are its competencies. This might seem simplistic but if nobody actually monitors the implementation of regulation or the body responsible for the implementation has no actual power, the regulation is not effective and will result in a low regulatory stringency. Also this looks at the level of professionalism of the regulator and investigates the sector specific knowledge a regulator has or is acquiring.

Level of the organisation is the second dimension within stringency, and focuses on how regulation impacts the organisation’s daily business. This includes things like distribution channel, product or advertisement restrictions and the legal obligation of internalising negative externalities. Gambling addiction, money laundering and other criminal activities are a feature of the industry and can be described as negative externalities. Internalisation investigates whether the regulation imposes a duty to take into account these externalities and minimise them.

Organizational Response to Regulation

There is a strong relationship between regulation and the management of the organisations subject to it. How a sector is regulated can have significant and far reaching consequences on how that organisation defines its performance and of course, the performance level itself. An argument can be made for a multidimensional performance definition embracing six dimensions and in which key performance indicators should be developed, measured and reported:

  • The financial dimension, as the traditional performance criterion, refers to revenue and profits.
  • The operational dimension focuses on how an organisation produces and delivers a service or product. It relates to internal processes and includes customer related indicators, learning and growth indicators, and internal business processes indicators.
  • Stakeholder management is the third dimension and it essentially looks at performance in relation to investors, employees and suppliers i.e. actors who have, in one form or another, invested in the company.
  • The fourth dimension is the legal requirement dimension. Here activities undertaken which are in compliance with regulatory obligations are measured.
  • Social issue participation is the fifth dimension. It is not directly linked to shareholder value creation but rather it relates to activities which benefit wider society. The idea behind this is that companies should not only optimise short-term financial performance but also voluntarily create value in and for society.
  • Sixth is the public values dimension which analyses performance of the values an organisation upholds – fairness, transparency, equality and inclusiveness.

An organisation able to demonstrate that they are at least as concerned as their regulator about their external impact gains credibility and is much more likely to have a voice in the creation and enactment of regulation. This in turn serves to secure the ability to influence.

The aim of regulation of games of chance is consumer protection.

Operators wishing to have balanced, effects-oriented regulation have to be at least as active and concerned as their regulator….arguably more so. Their contribution to social good will pay dividends that equate to stronger influence in the formation of regulation and operations more aligned with the aspirations and orientation of your clients. This can only lead to more secure profitability and longevity.

 

About the author of this article : Dr. Lea Meyer

Director of Polaris Strategic Foresight (PSF), offering research and consultancy aimed at assisting organisations in developing consistent, sophisticated performance strategies and strengthening relationships between regulator and operators. PSF also offers employee training, accreditation assessment and pre- and post regulatory research.

 

[1] For more information see “The Influence of the Regulatory Environment on the Definition of Organisational Performance – the Example of the Sport Betting and Lottery Sector”, Haupt 2015, https://www.haupt.ch/Verlag/Buecher/Wirtschaft-Recht/Public-Management/The-Influence-of-the-Regulatory-Environment-on-the-Definition-of-Organisational-Performance.html .

Related Articles

View all

Synopsis

Français

Régulation...qui en a besoin ?

La régulation représente l’un des principaux modes de gouvernance publique aujourd’hui. C’est le principal instrument utilisé pour gérer les risques liés aux jeux de hasard, et son but est de modifier le comportement des acteurs dans un secteur donné. La logique de base derrière la régulation est partagée entre les pays, mais son intensité peut varier entre les différents secteurs des jeux de hasard, que ce soit au niveau national ou entre les différents pays. Un débat approfondi sur la régulation doit sans aucun doute inclure une analyse des différents paramètres qu’elle comprend. Il est évident que l’environnement réglementaire a un impact sur les opérateurs qui y sont soumis, et que ces derniers réagissent tous de différentes façons. Le périmètre de la stratégie de mesure des performances est un des domaines où cela est le plus visible.

Español

Normativas... ¿Quién las necesita?

Las normativas representan uno de los muchos modos de gobierno público de hoy en día. Son el principal instrumento que se utiliza para gestionar el riesgo asociado a los juegos de azar y su objetivo es alterar el comportamiento de los actores de un sector. Aunque la base de las normativas es compartida entre países, su intensidad puede variar de un sector de los juegos de azar a otro, dentro del mismo país y entre distintos países. Un debate exhaustivo sobre las normativas debe incluir, sin ninguna duda, un análisis de los distintos parámetros que comprende. Es axiomático que el marco normativo tiene un impacto sobre los operadores sujetos a él, que responderán de distintos modos. Un área en la que esto es muy evidente es la delineación de estrategias de actuación y de medición del rendimiento.

Deutsch

Behördliche Auflagen ... wozu?

Behördliche Auflagen stellen eine der wichtigen Methoden zur öffentlichen Kontrolle dar. Sie sind das wichtigste Instrument, um Risiken beim Glücksspiel einzudämmen. Ihr Ziel ist es, die Akteure in der Branche zu Verhaltensänderungen zu bewegen. Während die Philosophie hinter behördlichen Auflagen Landesgrenzen überschreitet, kann die praktische Umsetzung von Glücksspielart zu Glücksspielart und von Land zu Land, aber auch innerhalb eines Landes, unterschiedlich ausfallen. Bei Diskussionen über behördliche Auflagen müssen die verschiedenen Parameter zweifelsohne analysiert werden. Auflagen wirken sich auf die regulierten Unternehmen aus; diese können auf unterschiedliche Arten und Weisen reagieren. Dies wird besonders daran deutlich, wie sie die Themen Leistungsstrategie und -messung angehen.

Other Articles

View all

Consumer driven innovations

Jana Smejcova, Kantar   Millennials, Gen Xers and Boomers Differences in consumer behaviour in the sector are evident between “Millennials, Gen Xers and Boomers”. According to Kantar’......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de

EU: CEN TF456 standardisation online gambling commences its work and EL participates in discussions on illegal platforms and Subsidiarity

In April 2018, following long consultations with stakeholders, the European Commission mandated the European Standardisation Committee CEN to draft a standard for a list of criteria for reporting to t......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de

Sport 4 Life UK received the EL Sport Award 2018

Olli Sarakoski, President & CEO of Veikkaus Oy handing the EL Sport Award 2018 to Jack Skinner and Matthew Forsyth from Sport 4 Life UK The first EL Sport Award, along with a check for 5000 euro......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de

Industry Days 2018 – Navigating Towards Digital Opportunity

Masters of ceremony Jutta Buyse (deputy EL Secretary-General) and Arjan van’t Veer (EL Secretary General) were lively hosts throughout the two-day meeting, keeping delegates well informed of the a......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de

EL/WLA Sports Betting Seminar 2018: Winning in Sports Betting

  The19th edition of the yearly EL/WLA Sports Betting Seminar took place in Lyon on 15-17 May with the great support of the hosting lottery La Française des Jeux (FDJ). The event registered......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de

PR/Communications and Social Media Seminar

Nikola Vrdoljak, Director 404 Agency Croatia, set the scene by describing how “anxious” the world has become; where sharing is the natural choice rather than owning and where in our “non-linear......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de

Knowledge Sharing 2.0

The 2018 Knowledge Sharing seminar took place in Geneva on April 18-19, where it gathered around 50 participants interested to learn more about the latest trends in lottery markets and exchange of i......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de

A new President & CEO for SELAE

Jesús Huerta Almendro, President & CEO for Sociedad Estatal Loterías y Apuestas del Estado Jesús Huerta Almendro was born in Cadiz/Spain in 1965. He holds a Law degree, a Master's degree in H......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de

IGT: New Execs Combine Complementary Strengths with a Single Purpose

The two most recent executives to join IGT’s lottery organization combine a wealth of complementary experience, together giving customers a powerful ally in harnessing the main drivers of lottery......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de

Scientific Games: Instant Games and the Quest for New Growth

The European market is not yet tapping into the potential of instant scratch games, which have been much more popular in the U.S. The average instant weekly per capita spend for the Top 10 European lo......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de

European Lotteries launches new European Lotteries Corporate University

Following a review of the requirements in this area EL is presenting a new 3-module European Lottery Corporate University (ELCU). Designed for various levels of participants, three separate modules wi......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de

A great success for the joint EL/WLA CSR-RG seminar in Lisbon

These numbers show both a high level of interest in CSR and RG across the lottery sector, as well as an enduring commitment from EL and WLA members to each issue as a core tenet of their business. Aft......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de

Upcoming EL Seminars & Events

Reserve your spot now for the EL Seminar that could change the course of your Lottery! EL and its Members are producing many educational programs designed to tackle real-world issues in a meaningful......

Read more

A new CEO for Svenska Spel

Patrik Hofbauer, CEO for Svenska Spel Patrik Hofbauer has extensive senior management experience and, in addition to his current role as CEO of Telenor Sweden, he has previously been CEO of Telenor......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de

Intralot: From waterfall product development to customer-centric, agile evolution: The role of the new Digital Service Platform

In nature, all organizations respond to changing environmental conditions by evolving themselves. It is a continuous struggle: change and adopt or perish. The same happens in the business world. The m......

Read more Synopsis: fr / es / de